Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz Portable

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz Portable
From: lawrence mayhead <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:57:41 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9SUzFzAvjhcaqHazGz2UpWfduiKmr7GKHmtp4+XfXJA=; b=B+PBrg0q3PChsS+UmLRePpxQuC+x5xZNsiakaxq4vS/tTD22PCznU0MTkJOiBbyJ8Y GY9tdwin3nsod2rmhawwCY3nfYzHnzOFKQg1B6/Kth2rs/ZousUC1eh7VMRnK5Trd3pX pj+BFEfrnbN+CiWQYTuhUX0V7/kQ5l5YtYnVs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SknXZkpTOG6AJd3s+j8FKKWvjfoNMOydNj5HhUYSrQj3MfhqGaJgwvL5VPD/srEQIm aamxVl1LnxbKI3QLSE+LORF4w/6xvPT6kuQPPhEned/8mvxC9/YtABkoWxr81R1LLEm8 CYL3f4zjz3qyg62q0h+UCDF5/kRn5Y+IgjOb0=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <00ce01c9d327$0f3bc390$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <[email protected]> <003801c9cfed$3754c170$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <007401c9d2fa$863a6280$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00ce01c9d327$0f3bc390$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
No dispute this time.
Laurie

2009/5/12 mal hamilton <[email protected]>
Lawerence
No one is disputing downward SLOPE reduces the effective height. We are discussing 500 Khz PORTABLE and the most convenient way to erect a suitable antenna with minimum effort and you agree at 500 Khz it will not be a serious disadvantage to have such a slope.
therefore a single mast and some slope is acceptable. You are AGREEING wiith me so I am confused by your email !!!!!! The topic is 500 Khz PORTABLE.
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz Portable

I fully agree with Mike and Andy, any slope downward will reduce the effective height of the antenna, and hence its radiation resistance.
This may not be too much of a problem on 500kHz where enough RF can be generated but on 136 not so good and on 73  useless.
I have proved this in practice as well as by simulation.
So there you are Mal.
Laurie G3AQC

2009/5/12 Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
A full quarter wave inverted L with sloping end is starting to become a loop with the ground path forming part of the loop conductor, rather than a vertical.   ANY antenna that approaches more than about a tenth of a wavelength cannot be treated as small any more, and must be considered in its entirety.  Such is obvious even before resorting to modelling.  Mike was referring to electrically short antennas where the downward sloping part simply opposes the current flow in the upward path.   
 
A small amount of slope on a large capacity hat might not be too noticeable in practice, as a lot of extra capacitance at the top could do more good than its slope undoes.
 
Please stop and actually think, and perhaps before being so rude and treating all why don't own millions of hectares of farmland as second-class radio-ams, you stop and read the exam question.

Andy  G4JNT
wobbleU cubed .g4jnt.kom


2009/5/12 mal hamilton <[email protected]>

You are certainly NO EXPERT at amateur radio never mind LF/MF and especially antennas.
I have worked the world on LF/MF using Inv L antennas with the far end just above ground , and in normal CW mode.
Some time ago it was Comics, elevated lemonade bottles as coil  formers, thought an AR88D was a  diversity fly catcher.
What is coming next? The diversity UMBRELLA!!!!
My current MF antenna is a full 1/4 wave inv L, 100 ft high and performs well but for some this might be difficult, therefore use what you can get on your property and let the far end tilt down if necessary.
G3KEV

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz Portable


You do not need 2 masts for an inv L or T antenna.
The so called horizontal wire(s) can slope down and the far end tied
to a bush or tree, or a stake in the ground via an insulator, as far
away as possible from the vert section, the longer the better. Keep it
simple. mal/g3kev

This is quite wrong. Any slope downwards will reduce the effective
height of a Marconi. Since ERP is a function of the square of the
effective height this is extremely important. An umbrella is far
preferable to an inverted-L in a single mast situation because a
large amount of capacitance to ground can be achieved without much
reduction of effective height.

Based on my experience of LF portable (both on 73 and 136kHz), my
advice is to make very sure that the remote ends of a Marconi are
very well insulated as they carry large voltages. Keep well away from
wet trees. This is not just a safety issue; any voltage leaked is
power lost.

Mike, G3XDV
==========




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.25/2109 - Release Date: 05/11/09 16:14:00






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.25/2109 - Release Date: 05/11/09 16:14:00

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>