LF,
Regarding my WSPR settings, the power is not a correct evaluation at the
moment. My Tx power is about 5 watts but the ERP will be very much lower &
as I have not calculated it as yet I have just inserted -27dB.
When I make the calculation I will insert the correct figure.
Cheers,
Gary - G4WGT.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT
Sent: 25 January 2009 19:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5
Hi All,
In agreement with John & Graham, I believe that makes sense. The top part of
the band is probably the least used area so we just need to agree on a 200Hz
slot of either 503.800 to 504.000KHz with no guard band or 503.700 to
503.900KHz with a 100Hz guard band.
My WSPR beacon is now active using dial frequency 502.000KHz & 503.550KHz
data.
Looks like Andy just beat me to the announcement.
73
Gary - G4WGT
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: 25 January 2009 18:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5
John,
Looks close to my post , just, as wspr is such a narrow mode, could move to
the band edge without problems
clear of the occasional qrss slightly lower down
With a move to vfo/exciter control, defining the wspr slot is a reasonable
concept as it will allow other 'casual'
monitor stations to be established .. and negate the number of post needed
to announce a test !
What of the beacons that used this area of the band , are they qrt or just
sleeping ?
G ..
--------------------------------------------------
From: "John P-G" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 6:04 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5
>
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:40:27 +0000
> Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is there some sort of unofficial bandplan on this band?
>
> Oh no!
>
> Please let's not get into this again....
>
> At the moment there is no bandplan, but general concensus would
> indicate "beacons at the band edges - real QSOs in the middle".
>
> The current WSPR activity around 503.5 (502.0 dial) seems reasonable,
> although moving up a few hundred Hz wouldn't hurt, say to 502.3 dial
> which gives a 200Hz window at 503.7 - 503.9
>
> There are often CW mode beacons near the bottom of the band - GI4DPE,
> GW3UEP and others, and it's convenient to have them there - it allows
> monitoring them and SK6RUD concurrently.
>
>
> That's just my view on how things have evolved.
>
> "Real Man's CW" seems to live around 502.63
>
> John
> GM4SLV
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1914 - Release Date:
> 1/24/2009 20:40
>
|
