To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: 136khz WSPR |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:39:49 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=RoT28W8ghIY5nczUN3dfUftsiwEsqugBwwxU2h9nh3NgKuQRmu0bqgeXUM3Bnq03X0U4PIkHpu6IBrQSuUaxdaGS8ubRZ+F60NpSOxZKpv0y7TZSX5AjILlN8Pms0OVDVm0QJ9hh7N4ZyCSZdUj2XNSitWhcV75Lxaax60rTgRk= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <000e01c97703$df2dfcb0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> |
References: | <F4E8A04C3CBA4C67AE9C3318F2F40C4F@JimPC> <[email protected]> <0F3DBBAC61C545AE85525CD884B642EC@Black> <20090114231729.6b8aea4f@lurcher> <2AD1A31DF27448F495C0CE7FF33CE9DE@Black> <C4F6E432D5814955A1FDD42B0279F472@AGB> <1E6D0A88C4DE49E5A2AF05911187E7A3@Black> <424931F60B3D4F41AB7DCB9E9FCAB3C5@big7368b9a7d3d> <E68E6C5A539A4838ADAC20BE903CBC68@JimPC> <000e01c97703$df2dfcb0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Jay, Vernon, LF Group, Jay - Thanks for looking - I can see that could be the problem!The WSPR signal has a bandwidth of around 6Hz, so the problem is finding that much of a gap between lines. E.g. with the Northeastern USA chain with 9960 GRI, lines should appear every 5.02Hz roughly, although I expect some will probably be stronger than others. Can you look with Argo on a wider setting to see if there are any 6Hz wide spaces, or at least areas where the lines are weaker? Vernon - I'm afraid "SCP/LN8PHG" probably isn't a genuine signal, but WSPR producing a false decode - this is fairly common when narrow-band QRM is present, although only occurs rarely when just the band noise is present. Because of the way WSPR encodes/decodes, it will usually try to format any "gobbledygook" as a legitimate message with callsigns, reports, etc. You can usually tell by the outlandish callsigns and locators. A pity really, otherwise they would be pretty impressive DX! Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 184khz VO1NA QRT, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: Re: 136khz WSPR, Vernon Matheson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: 136khz WSPR, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: 136khz WSPR, Vernon Matheson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |