Could you move to 503.835 and see if the frequency separation between
you and Gary cures the decode failures?
yes wspr seems to get a bit confused by the close track .. i see what looks
like
imd from the two close signals
.. Interesting night .. my wspr looks to of had many false decodes
qrp has mapped out the skip distance quite well ..
G4JNT is showing 10 db over the noise floor on speclab
looks good enough for a data qso .. with 2 mW erp ?
Power now at 100 watts feed for last 30 mins
G ..
--------------------------------------------------
From: "John P-G" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:19 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Distance
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:59:39 -0000
"James Moritz" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear John, LF Group,
Yes, that's me... copy is looking very patchy at your QTH tonight. I
see the others are copying OK, from G3XVL at around +12dB SNR, down
to the -20s by more distant stations, so there does not seem to be a
problem with the transmitted signal. I seem to be copying everyone
OK, except G0NBD - but there is a weak carrier here on about 503.950
which is probably QRMing him. You haven't changed PC by any chance...
Hello Jim,
No, everything is as normal here - same hardware throughout.
The waterfall shows your signal as bright red, despite no decode.
But... there's always a faint trace just a few Hz hf of you too, not
sure if it's being generated by you, or just coinicidence - nor if
that's the reason that you're not decoding. I normally have no problems
with you.
The 32:14 period had a bright trace from you, but no decode, and a much
fainter trace at 503.914 which decoded as G4WGT.
Could you move to 503.835 and see if the frequency separation between
you and Gary cures the decode failures?
John
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1925 - Release Date: 01/30/09
07:37:00
|
