Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: RE: RE: WSPR beacon on 136kHz - QRT |
| From: | "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:15:00 -0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:Importance:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE; b=JwaMSV0rWBb8Ug45J+XpGT2G99DTGNGBDPWAJfagh0v3Rj512NHxI5s+lLoWZMKFtbaKc1Zd3UwZeM3AgoFQdRK3txevF8b+N+0bFpGVeqrWNDALGdQZvTxULpJMCUlX2yJnY/j+oNE3m78uF3cpm9lOJO49V4Bo6xJuX44e/lE= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <449039E4D90C4C018B07BA23385099FD@JimPC> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Jim, LF. Sadly no decodes from M0BMU or DF6NM on 136 last night. M0BMU was clearly audible and was showing on the waterfall display. I'm using WSPR 1.01_r1023, and it worked fine on 500kHz the other day. Am I doing something wrong? (well, yes, obviously, but what!) 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of James Moritz Sent: 12 January 2009 02:15 To: [email protected] Subject: LF: RE: WSPR beacon on 136kHz - QRT Dear LF Group, The WSPR beacon is now QRT at 0206utc - I was worried about falling asleep with 900W going up the antenna, which is now waving around a lot in the wind! Many thanks for all the reports, which have made this a successful first attempt at WSPR on 136k for this station. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: XGJ_XKO, victor13 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: RE: WSPR beacon on 136kHz - QRT, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: WSPR beacon on 136kHz - QRT, jrusgrove |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: RE: WSPR beacon on 136kHz - QRT, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |