Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: Re: 137

from [Mike-WE0H] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: 137
From: Mike-WE0H <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:43:45 -0600
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kVg0llU4s2Oy6jvGyNtu+NJTA+ffyjF3Sx/BueoB7O7AqTYIMDsBeZB3jsN3jNzJKZt1HYj0f+bs2pgKW4O09hA9wdaMdtfV65C7yP3jTmtn+v2m81YVf2jukEjoY6390CddXCFDN9/0vNKa+Xu7mqhk3eEIdltcOA+u1bJ/Zg8= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <D86D53D70918451BBC580D8F5BF0EDAF@JimPC>
References: <008c01c97bf2$2ec4eed0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <D86D53D70918451BBC580D8F5BF0EDAF@JimPC>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
I wondered that too. 2200 meters is a mess of Loran and other strange signals over here also. maybe we all should push for some new Experimental space down there and later get it turned into an Amateur Band???

Mike
WE0H
/16



Jim wrote:
Dear Mal, LF Group,

I don't know... but it was probably the same as the reason for which the 73kHz band was withdrawn at about the same time that all the utilities which had been operating inside or near that part of the spectrum were decomissioned ;-)

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU


Mal wrote:


Does anyone know why 137 khz was chosen as an amateur allocation, in that freq area it is the most polluted part, clobbered at both ends by commercial high power transmitters...


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Re: 137, James Moritz
Next by Date:  RE: LF: 137 NIL, Laurence BY3A-KL1X China
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: 137, James Moritz
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: 137, John RABSON
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]