To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: 137 |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:25:31 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=wkzC8yLKEdzefkNFax4hCYo0GNe19c0FPmVj/HZEmdFAZ5Q8EXJw/A20/SooLAh0/Im5rmAOlNey6iex5h0hrcthi4A+6fcM2N7Mxwx/6h55LXlIEki+32QOpiLgHirw/7VNoZX5pFdnFv83BYDcoHTKUMCx8QFF4N8/e5qngV8= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <008c01c97bf2$2ec4eed0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
References: | <008c01c97bf2$2ec4eed0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Mal, LF Group,I don't know... but it was probably the same as the reason for which the 73kHz band was withdrawn at about the same time that all the utilities which had been operating inside or near that part of the spectrum were decomissioned ;-) Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU----- Original Message ----- From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> To: "rsgb" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 6:00 PM Subject: LF: 137Does anyone know why 137 khz was chosen as an amateur allocation, in that freq area it is the most polluted part, clobbered at both ends by commercial high power transmitters... |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 137, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: 137, Mike-WE0H |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 137, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: 137, Mike-WE0H |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |