Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: ant diversity

To: "rsgb" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: ant diversity
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:35:16 -0000
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
MF
Testing two antennas in diversity on signals around EU seem to give the same results. Both antennas producing virtually the same results, no one any better than the other, this is probably because with these antennas the signals are strong and fade barely noticeable.
This is just a comparison test and not scientific, therefore no measurements have been made. The object of the exercise is to maximise the signal presentation on received signals for QSO purposes. There is some fade noticeable at times but only minimal and signals are perfectly readable both visual and audible all the time.
I have to check the system on long haul where fade is noticeable especially the USA stns. One other point is antenna separation, my antennas are not far enough apart, although they are clear from one another.
Maybe two small dissimilar antennas, spaced well apart would give discernable differences in diversity reception, a small loop orientated towards the targetg signal and a small vertical or probe type.
I have been watching SK6RUD and DI2AM most of today and each has been strong throughout the day with virtually no noticeable fade observed on either antenna.
 
Antennas tested are :-
190 metre loop, 40 metre loop and a 1/4 wave inv L full size on 500 khz. The 1/4 wave is more lively than the loops, noise increases but so does the signal, so its all relative. General noise level at this qth is low, mostly atmospheric noise.
 
As described before I am using two RX's and both audio ouputs displayed separately to compare signal intensity. I briefly tried one RX and two antennas but that did not look as good and was difficult to balance each antenna, bearing in mind that cancellation could be a problem if not engineered properly.
I have seen this method used in the past with a properly designed front end mixer pre RX and each antenna's performance visible on a meter.
This was on HF and was very impressive watching the signal on one  antenna peak while the other hardly produced any signal and vice versa.
This was using two dissimilar hf antennas spaced apart but only a 100 metres or so.
 
73 de mal/g3kev
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
73 de mal/g3kev
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>