To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: whisper |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:53:17 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=mBoEN/7pDOay8+aeGLbolqK5pcLnMw4Oi6BEcs8THJDnJylFm0QWpGOebBPCEyvOR+y5YJm/3bclApmZf4fZrv0BDTc+4eQEZTfdEWV2Y4UB4WwxVNnhcGJpuT5ORcQSlBY2bYAQQDvG7IRMGvl2oVpGXERqHbdaXkPHGNS3EHQ= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Uwe, LF Group, I downloaded the WSPR software last night and attempted to receive your beacon - but not until after 2300utc, at which time I could not see your sigs at my QTH or on DF6NM's grabber. Not suprisingly I didn't get any decodes of your signal, but did see lots of bogus exotic DX on the output screen, especially when the Luxembourg effect noise was strong! Looking at the spectrogram, there is a permanent weak carrier close to 136.000kHz (also seen and heard at many other QTHs I believe), so perhaps not the best QRG. I did notice there is a null in the sidebands from the Hungarian 135.4kHz station at about 135.975kHz, so that might be a better frequency for tests. I can't transmit the WSPR signal on 136k at the moment, but could do on 500kHz - anyone interested? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: whisper, uwe-jannsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: whisper, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 13777.2khz.jpg, henny van elst |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: whisper, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |