To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RE: 500kHz from 3B8 |
From: | "Dominic Baines" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:52:29 -0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=netbanx.com; h=from:to: references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=secure; bh=H u9cluAlMv6/G+7KOjMaBFCdXS8=; b=V9ZTW0wdwYE3pO2fU9+YjhZdM0tu84Hm/ tloQW6mKDCnVCp/QHSQoxt2aK6iDV0pkf4L2GKZ9vitLSF/I26RaWKb0Tt2zq8s0 3rcAaWINE+G+qGWs8ZHLbiruBw7EIy5enY7DQvNYl20TXO4+EsRrHKDLJSHaLh13 pDYwAiIJoY= |
In-reply-to: | <001e01c8881e$814a8480$0900a8c0@AM> |
References: | <[email protected]> <00d001c8809a$71f10940$0900a8c0@Lark> <[email protected]> <001301c880b3$c8f8a9a0$0900a8c0@Lark> <000801c88111$a25c1530$0e00000a@AGB> <004301c88122$618a8bc0$0900a8c0@Lark> <01c001c8880f$256a2760$3005a8c0@AndrewPoodle> <001e01c8881e$814a8480$0900a8c0@AM> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AciIHoh3JWrJC1ZPQ3WO2uq83WVvlgABsJVQ |
Hi all... -----Original Message----- From: Alan Melia [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 17 March 2008 10:49 To: Dominic Baines Subject: Re: 500kHz from 3B8 Hi Dom, thanks for the report, yes the "static" from storms is always a problem in those lattitudes. I think this is why LF and MF is predominantly a higher latitude activity. I am sure the active guys would be interested to know, even though your results were negative. I had forgotten about your "expedition" It is a pity we did not announce it on the LF reflector and tried to raise some targeted efforts. Still activity was fairly high in the UK during that period and several stations are running the newly allowed higher power. Also the German stations were active. Best Wishes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominic Baines" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:13 AM Subject: 500kHz from 3B8 > Alan, > > My results from 3B8 trip.... > > I heard no notable call signs, letters or signals between 500 and 504kHz. > The noise floor was very high though. > > Several days everything had to be collapsed due to danger of lightning > strikes, I used a 160m vertical and added L to bring it into resonance on > 500kHz. > > It is a shame to have heard nothing. > > 73 > > Dom > M1KTA > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 187.375 kHz Beacon, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--------MB_8CA5645FAE207AA_1008_2534_WEBMAIL-MA06.sysops.aol.com", markusvester |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: JT65-A Beacon on 501.7 KHz - QRT 0030, Graham |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Smaller DC feeding choke in class E amplifier, Michael Probert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |