To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re. LF Receivers |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:03:51 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <012420081531.5467.4798AF54000325AB0000155B22155688849C9D01CD05@comcast.net> |
References: | <012420081531.5467.4798AF54000325AB0000155B22155688849C9D01CD05@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
Z-usanet-msgid: | XID242maXwD20181X29 |
[email protected] wrote: Back to the AGC issues, Rob Sherwood of Sherwood Engineering has published a slide presentation on how poorly ALL DSPreceivers perform under QRN conditions due to the DSP handling of AGC: I don't know which receivers he tested, but the problem he reported is simply caused by a too fast attack time of the AGC, which reacts to narrow spikes and pulses, lowering unnecessarily the gain of the receiver and causing a sort of pumping effect. In software that can be fixed quite easily. That the manufacturers of blazoned DSP radios haven't done it, that is a different discourse... 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 137.7772, Laurence KL1X |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re. LF Receivers, k2ors |
Next by Thread: | LF: XGR/3 WOLF Tonight, John Andrews |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |