Re: LF: RE: LF Receiver

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: RE: LF Receiver
From:	Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:23 +0000
In-reply-to:	<C0DBF05CD6EFA942992A028029605C8F07D75D97@SYDEXM02.ent.foxtel.com.au>
References:	<[email protected]> <C0DBF05CD6EFA942992A028029605C8F07D75D97@SYDEXM02.ent.foxtel.com.au>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)


Hi Nick,

The R75 is pretty much the receiver of choice in the LFcommunity in the US. Works well out of the box, andexcellent value for money.


        Cheers,

                Steve


http://www.w3eee.com


Nick Mclean (SYD) wrote:

Hi all,
Do many people on the list use an Icom IC-R75?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: [500] Signal of OK0EMW in Moscow, (continued) LF: [500] Signal of OK0EMW in Moscow, Lubomír Bobalík Re: LF: [500] Signal of OK0EMW in Moscow, Roman . Re: LF: DI2AM and OK0EMW strong in SM, Johan H. Bodin LF: RE: DI2AM and OK0EMW strong in SM, Lubomír Bobalík Re: LF: RE: DI2AM and OK0EMW strong in SM, Johan H. Bodin LF: [500] SM6LKM_OK0EMW strong in SM, Lubomír Bobalík Re: LF: LF Receiver, Alberto di Bene LF: RE: LF Receiver, Nick Mclean (SYD) LF: Re: RE: LF Receiver, Mike McAlevey LF: LF Receiver, Laurence KL1X Re: LF: RE: LF Receiver, Steve Dove <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Low long wires, lawrence mayhead
Next by Date:	LF: Re. LF Receivers, Alberto di Bene
Previous by Thread:	LF: LF Receiver, Laurence KL1X
Next by Thread:	LF: MF/LF, mal
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]