To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Loran Anthorn |
From: | "Markus Vester" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:03:24 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <00c101c832cc$1e7747f0$e1136a58@wgt01> |
References: | <00c101c832cc$1e7747f0$e1136a58@wgt01> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Gary,
LF,
according to my 100 kHz monitor, Anthorn
Loran came on the Lessay chain rate (GRI 6731)
yesterday 10:25 UT. After some adjustments of the transmission delay,
they reached their "final parking position" in the old Rugby slot
(27.3 ms after Lessay) at about 11:40. The
sideband lines should now be on the usual frequencies, i.e. exact multiples
of 100 kHz / 6731 / 2.
The time-domain graph was
recorded 2007-11-30, 10:00 (bottom) to 13:00 (top), using 22050 samples/s
(left to right) and phase encoded as colour.
Best wishes to all
Markus, DF6NM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
To: "LF (Rsgb LF Group)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:09
PM
Subject: LF: Loran Anthorn > > Can anyone tell me how to calculate the extra lines produced by Loran > Anthorn on 137 KHz. I now have twice as many lines as before which are not > shown on my spreadsheet list of line frequencies previously seen. > > My location is considerably closer to Anthorn than Rugby although I would > have thought that if the pulse generation is the same I will still see the > same lines but stronger. > > Any comments please. > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp > > >
Anthorn_firstsignal_071130_1000-1300.png |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: CW TEST ON 503.2 KHZ, Paul-Henrik |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Loran Anthorn, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 137.780, Willem de Roode |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Loran Anthorn, Gary - G4WGT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |