To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: CW TEST ON 503.2 KHZ |
From: | Paul-Henrik <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:29:41 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <001d01c833aa$a03b0ae0$0d00000a@AGB> |
References: | <00bd01c832ca$bc7d25c0$e1136a58@wgt01> <001b01c832e0$9b97a950$0d00000a@AGB> 1650000000264359879 <[email protected]> <001d01c833aa$a03b0ae0$0d00000a@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 |
> HI All , > If anyone's about ,,, > Trying out 'new' Ae configuration , running a cw beacon on 503.2 , if > you > can 'see' it > Reports welcome > Tnx > Graham > G0NBD / IO83LK Very faint signals received by ear around 22.30z, without knowing your QRG and call it would have been impossible. I'm quite sure on the suffix "NBD" after some "interpolation" of many rounds of the callsign. Would be good to hear if you were using normal-speed CW at that time. Conditions appeared extremely bad yesterday night, please let us know if you will have another go tonight. With some improvement in condx a full aural copy should be possible. 73's Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ Vaasa / KP03SD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 137.780, Willem de Roode |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Loran Anthorn, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: CW TEST ON 503.2 KHZ, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: CW TEST ON 503.2 KHZ, . Roman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |