Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Loran Anthorn

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Loran Anthorn
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:25:39 -0000
References: <00c101c832cc$1e7747f0$e1136a58@wgt01> <1E301CE5F3F64CE3AB3BC05EEC77E36F@Amilo3205>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Hi Markus,

Thanks for that explanation, that must be the reason why I was seeing additional lines. All is normal from yesterday (30th).

Cheers,

Gary - G4WGT.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 11:03 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Loran Anthorn


Hi Gary, LF,

according to my 100 kHz monitor, Anthorn Loran came on the Lessay chain rate (GRI 6731) yesterday 10:25 UT. After some adjustments of the transmission delay, they reached their "final parking position" in the old Rugby slot (27.3 ms after Lessay) at about 11:40. The sideband lines should now be on the usual frequencies, i.e. exact multiples of 100 kHz / 6731 / 2.

The time-domain graph was recorded 2007-11-30, 10:00 (bottom) to 13:00 (top), using 22050 samples/s (left to right) and phase encoded as colour.

Best wishes to all

Markus, DF6NM





----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
To: "LF (Rsgb LF Group)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:09 PM
Subject: LF: Loran Anthorn


Hi All,

Can anyone tell me how to calculate the extra lines produced by Loran
Anthorn on 137 KHz. I now have twice as many lines as before which are not
shown on my spreadsheet list of line frequencies previously seen.

My location is considerably closer to Anthorn than Rugby although I would
have thought that if the pulse generation is the same I will still see the
same lines but stronger.

Any comments please.

73

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>