Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: QRSS report on the beacon band

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS report on the beacon band
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:23:59 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Quite...
 
G ..
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS report on the beacon band

Hi Peter.
 
Thank you for the report.
 
I know beacons are not everyone's idea of best band usage but I try to keep my meagre 5mW out of the way at the top end of the band. (well, at the top end of Dave's grabber which I use for monitoring)
Also, I do get a couple of e-mails a week from people who tune their radios down to 500k for the first time and then report the beacon as the only signal that's there during the 10 or 15 mins they listen.
If the band was full with people struggling to find space to have a QSO I would of course switch it off.
 
Thanks again
 
David
 
 
 
In a message dated 08/09/2007 11:00:18 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
I don't think I should be encouraging this but here it is any way. MRF you are 579 at IO91UX. 80m dipole up 13m untuned  RX TS690s wid no mods. see attached trace.
 
FMT
 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.9/994 - Release Date: 9/7/2007 16:40
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>