Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:41:43 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=KCLa2CqhwzU73yEefqHxMZ/GFXx1lADAGK6QdVKrmOTyPT4ZrmqkT9z1Uti5hRU6cQ3z0+W8uUMUuYnChAPt8ZcLZwBJFQHZlKXNXrXWCSF+SzMu6orzmaIz9iii10JYBkIZucfSDuQQrkrckuNGOzg6o1r4aGnRvPyH3hdygo8= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | bad (test mode) |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| References: | <006b01c7d3ba$78370d00$0300a8c0@lark> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Dave, LF Group, > And another point which worries me. Are we allowed to operate > unattended beacons on the band? I don't think there have been any unattended beacons on 500kHz. The licence says "unattended" is where the licencee is at a different location from the equipment - as far as I know, all the beacon transmissions on 500k have been from people's usual QTHs. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions, Alan Ibbetson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: newbie help, James Moritz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions, Dave Sergeant |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions, Dave Sergeant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |