LF: RE: 500 v 136

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: RE: 500 v 136
From:	"Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:59:39 +0100
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:Importance:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To; b=fRZZnKoPHDjRtKvA7mc8ySYqb+f6i/nVCh9LS22bbGZshgbT4e+n2nfmnC9ZvKGGyEjKxDvpAhgp81TqlKjrSG9iM02jNCQKwfsPzyrrOj8rnin01yr5IYD3GEjmSDxHcHuqHZGo/NWVmQQFBQSED8is/+2q4wJbc0A7DqNSXTs= ;
Domainkey-status:	bad (test mode)
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
Importance:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<000f01c7c96a$a88c6cc0$45e8fc3e@g3kev>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi, Mal.

Have you worked John GM4SLV in the Shetlands yet?

73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of hamilton mal
Sent: 18 July 2007 19:37
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: 500 v 136


Hi All
It looks like 500 is going the same way as 136. If Beacons and QRS are the
trend then the band will fizzle out when the novelty wears off.
QRS does little to encourage improving antennas or more efficient PA
systems, or perfecting the basic skill of using CW, which has always been
the traditional mode on the band.
G3KEV

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 500 v 136, hamilton mal LF: RE: 500 v 136, Dave G3WCB <= Re: LF: RE: 500 v 136, John GM4SLV Re: LF: RE: 500 v 136, Dave Sergeant Re: LF: RE: 500 v 136, John GM4SLV Re: LF: 500 v 136, John GM4SLV Re: LF: 500 v 136, G3vtt

Previous by Date:	LF: 500 v 136, hamilton mal
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 500 v 136, G3vtt
Previous by Thread:	LF: 500 v 136, hamilton mal
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: RE: 500 v 136, John GM4SLV
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]