| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Winrad and Windows 98 (again) ?? |
| From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2007 18:08:13 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <002401c79d52$af5dfd00$0300a8c0@lark> |
| References: | <004e01c79610$0592d320$fe79a8c0@PCVONWALTER> <[email protected]> <004301c797c9$f26e8b20$0300a8c0@lark> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002401c79d52$af5dfd00$0300a8c0@lark> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
| Z-usanet-msgid: | XID103LewqiR0467X39 |
Alan Melia wrote: Alberto The one I downloaded was OK but it had the same ver no and build as a previous non-worker ?? Alan Alan,well, yes... I did upload V1.23 build 28 a couple of days ago, but it still contained the error that I had thought to have corrected. Now I have effectively corrected it, and have uploaded again the program, which still is V1.23 build 28, but without the error (hopefully). I kept the version and the build number equal to those of the regular version of Winrad that had the same general functionalities. 73 Alberto I2PHD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Winrad and Windows 98 (again) ??, Alan Melia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): di2be.jpg, henny van elst |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Winrad and Windows 98 (again) ??, Alan Melia |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Winrad V1.25, Alberto di Bene |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |