Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 500 kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 500 kHz
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:54:40 +0100
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=efehTNFD3v7SpLm2xzPcvE3+UQ8b7lcpqMJSVe/lwCjUFJ5mYqppRUl0UZUUdvsRvp3aWQ5eHRoQ0/pVmk44oAmLB6+LwztpE3RROQ0Tmz3aGRD+WC+Eb4ZOG/MAhqd2sd3fj8IGmN+qbW/U7VIOqVDIkHNQKbvPr87YMfFMJtc= ;
Domainkey-status: good (test mode)
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi David, its not optimum electronic cut and try !!.....but try
putting 1000pF (or a few pF less) across L2, which makes it parallel
resonant at 1000kHz and increases the 2nd harmonic rejection at the cost of
slightly less ultimate out-of-band rejection

Cheers de Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: 26 April 2007 13:15
Subject: Re: LF: 500 kHz

> This should do the job.
> _
> (
> 73
> David

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>