LF: Re: Attachment test

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: Attachment test
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:20:39 -0000
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=y2SvZpzTTUWZg2x5k744U1kqwC5fqpAMCeimFKdZLffvMJ1d6B06q/BBt0mfveW2sug8EIbUCyYrI6vVUQRIYHedrKI4chnL5UvdIjeG1O2jf6xWdbbhhnqNaB/j5I3TWhgCpyqYWbSS3sOau/hcz/vBvjv8eDSIYf05BWnqfZ4= ;
Domainkey-status:	bad (test mode)
References:	<00aa01c71fb4$e1fd80d0$46366a58@wgt01>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Gary. Ah I have looked at the message source for this message and
compared it with the first one......and there does not seem to be a lot of
difference....just the subject line.....mmmmm I will now print the two
details and see what the differences are in detail.

Cheers de Alan

----- Original Message -----
From: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
To: LF (Rsgb LF Group) <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: 14 December 2006 19:20
Subject: LF: Attachment test

> Hi All,
>
> Apologies in advance if this causes a "cock up".
>
> SM6BHZ on 505.06KHz.
>
> 73
>
> Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Attachment test, Gary - G4WGT LF: Re: Attachment test, Alan Melia <=

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: Ansoft Designer, Stephen McAdam
Next by Date:	LF: Re: SM6BHZ is active on 600 meters tonight, James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	LF: Attachment test, Gary - G4WGT
Next by Thread:	LF: RE: Re: Ansoft Designer, Talbot Andrew
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]