To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Slow PSK result |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:04:44 EST |
Delivery-date: | Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:05:35 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Scott, thank you very much. As I don't currently have a way to lock the receiver and soundcard to GPS, the best I can do is narrow spectrograms, and there are no magic numbers regarding frequency selection. I would probably select a frequency in the TA waterhole (137776 to 781) as it is monitored by several people, including Hartmut whose antennas are some 10 dB better than mine. 73 and best of luck, Markus, DF6NM In einer eMail vom 19.02.2006 00:15:31 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [email protected]: If you like I can place TIL on this evening starting at local sunset ~0100UTC on a different frequency then John. I'd like to do some key down tests on the new 1KW amp module so I could kill two birds with one stone. Please advise on a frequency that would work. I can do anything a AD9850 will allow feed with a 20MHz disp. osc. will allow. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Slow PSK result, Hartmut Wolff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Slow PSK result, Scott Tilley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Slow PSK result, John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Slow PSK result, Scott Tilley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |