Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: TR

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: TR
From: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:23:03 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:23:52 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <000c01c62258$a84505c0$06e8fc3e@l8p8y6>
References: <000c01c62258$a84505c0$06e8fc3e@l8p8y6>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
Hi Mal,
interesting observations. Here I usual have a stronger fade-in period (1-2 hours), followed by a deeper fade. Then signals recover depending on the K-index of the last days. If the K-index was higher more fading is visible. Before the stronger fade-out period starts there appeared a deeper fade.

Attached a screenshot taken last night. It seems John, WD2XES was a bit late and missed the good overnight period.

I'll upload more captures later the day to my website when back home from work.

73

Hartmut


hamilton mal schrieb:
Hi All
Stns observed during the night. VO1NA, XKO and XES.
XKO strongest sig last nite and vy good around 0800z, XES not as strong as usual and VO1NA only visible at times but a good signal when he popped up. There were a couple of others that I could not make out *MJ My observations indicate that the best time for TR to my QTH is late morning 0700 - 0900z other time is 0001 - 0200z approx and little or no propagation the rest of the time during night time. ie my sunrise seems best and sunset at the USA end. This is the RX situation at my end, TX could be different from here. I am surprised that there is no propagation during the majority of the dark hours at both ends.
What does Alan think about that.
73 de Mal/G3KEV/IO94SH/Scarborough



JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>