Hello Mike and everybody else,
Thank you for your interest. The file is 65 kB and seems to be a little
large for the list. I will send a copy to all who have asked for it. I have
written an extensive article on this antenna and have send it to Electron, a
Dutch Amateur Radio Magazine, almost a year ago. Unfortunately, it still has
not appeared in print. This is the reason that the information is not
available on a website yet.
Just a few words on the development of the antenna. Four years ago I have
been building all kind of loops, as I was convinced that loops are best at
LF. I spend a whole winter season and they worked excellent in receiving
local noise. I almost gave up, believing that weak signal reception was not
possible in a city environment. As a last attempt, I connected the 12 m long
open feeders of my 80 m dipole together and used it as T-antenna. Though 6 m
of the feedline runs close to the wall, local noise was much lower.
Reception was much improved and using a RF-isolating transformer it worked
even better.
Then I started experimenting with whip antennas. I have done a lot of
research, which includes field reception tests in a RF-quiet environment,
where I could not find a difference between a loop and an active whip. At
home it is different.
I found that at LF local noise in the electric field is contained inside a
building, whilst local noise in the magnetic field is not. The screening for
the electric field can be as large as 30 - 40 dB for a concrete building. So
far I have found one written source that confirms this phenomenon: a small
German book on active antennas.
As you can read in the attachment, it was possible to reduce the size of an
active whip considerable. The "standard" mini-whip is 8 cm long. At present,
I am using one that has been squeezed inside half a film canister: 30 mm
high! Passive electric field antennas have also been tested, using a 100 : 1
RF transformer. In this case the "antenna" was a large 5 kg coffee tin. It
worked fine.
Reception results have been very nice. At present my main interest is
chasing NDB's. However, I have had solid qrss60 copy of VO1NA, WD2XKO and
WD2XDW around 137.777 kHz. Regarding NDB's; in a little over three years,
1250 different stations made it into my log. To be honest, I must confess
that I am using narrow bandwidth aural reception with a basic bandwidth of
20 Hz, provided by a SPM-30 SLM and a pair of modified PA0LQ active filters
which reduce the bandwidth to 12 or 6 Hz. For NDB reception this compensates
for a large extend the lack of directivity of the mini-whip.
I am not saying that loops are bad antennas. To the contrary, I still have
an active loop and use it from time to time in a phasing system with my
mini-whip. That is, when local noise is low. Last week I have been lucky in
receiving a NDB from Alaska: station PVQ on 376 kHz, Put River, Deadhorse,
6288 km. Reception was over a Polar path and the signal was very stable,
without fading. Finbar O'Connor, EI0CF heard it a few days later, using a
screened loop. This shows that both antennas can be great performers.
This all might sound a bit odd, but this antenna is for real. I have put a
lot of work in it and it has been great fun. You do not have to believe me
(probably I should not have done that myself, four years ago). But whoever
wants a small antenna, just give it a try. As you might have gathered: it
does not work inside.
Thank you for the bandwidth.
Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt
P.S. the summery will be send a little later
|
