Dave,
Your setup sounds fine, and the 0.020 Hz reading is close enough for any
practical purpose. And you won't draw me into an argument about QSO's over
multiple days!
I should really have copied your signal in the following segment. The
numbers all looked good, but no results. Back in the "good old days", I
would have a .wav file, and would manipulate a bunch of parameters to coax
out some copy. Not a very valuable technique for QSO's! I think we are
better off just taking what comes out of the program as it's being run.
The "f: 0.020" entries were frequent enough to convince me that it was
seeing the signal regularly up to 0300 or so. Little useful info appeared
after that.
John Andrews
|
