LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF

from [Dave Pick]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF
From:	"Dave Pick" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:12:05 +0100
Delivery-date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:12:54 +0100
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
In-reply-to:	<001801c54c17$2aec3890$8d01a8c0@JKA>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
Thread-index:	AcVMFaShCzzR6pt/Qri96gQDR/eLdQAB9gSQ

OK John.

I'll set it up for 136.082 if the storms have abated your side.

Dave G3YXM

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Andrews
Sent: 28 April 2005 18:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF

Dave,

Is there a lower slot? I don't want to annoy all those nocturnal CWoperators...


Well, we certainly wouldn't want to annoy all of those guys, would we? A
quick search doesn't turn up anything ideal, but 136.082 isn't too bad in
the east. Given the increasing noise levels, this is probably an east coast
project, anyway.

John Andrews

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews Re: LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Bill de Carle LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick <= LF: Re: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews
Next by Date:	Re: LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, MarkusVester
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]