LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF

from [Dave Pick]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF
From:	"Dave Pick" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:02:46 +0100
Delivery-date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:03:53 +0100
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
In-reply-to:	<000901c54bfb$5f2964f0$8d01a8c0@JKA>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
Thread-index:	AcVL+k3azOVqZSTdRcifu31mHygATQACN1Fg

Is there a lower slot? I don't want to annoy all those nocturnal CW
operators...

Dave G3YXM

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Andrews
Sent: 28 April 2005 15:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF

Upon further reflection, it would make sense to move the EU to NA WOLF
transmissions down to the lower end of the band. With NA transmitting
activity at the high end, this should help with receiving the weak
signal(s).

I would suggest 136.318 kHz, as it is fairly Loran-free at the NA end.

John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews Re: LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Bill de Carle LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick <= LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick LF: Re: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Bill de Carle
Next by Date:	LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Bill de Carle
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, John Andrews
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]