| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF |
| From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:24:42 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:13:49 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dave, Is there a lower slot? I don't want to annoy all those nocturnal CW operators... Well, we certainly wouldn't want to annoy all of those guys, would we? A quick search doesn't turn up anything ideal, but 136.082 isn't too bad in the east. Given the increasing noise levels, this is probably an east coast project, anyway. John Andrews |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
| Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF, Dave Pick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |