To: | hamilton mal <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re[2]: LF: TA MAR 11/12 |
From: | YU7AR <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:05:59 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <001b01c52e1c$414db1e0$25d1fc3e@l8p8y6> |
Organization: | pyrotherm |
References: | <002601c526f8$5d392c20$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <[email protected]> <001b01c52e1c$414db1e0$25d1fc3e@l8p8y6> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Mal, yes fackt is, mi RX and TX sistem is disproportional, now I test new K9AY two turns loop for RX. Maybe build another bandpass receving loop from Jim M0BMU . Another fact is ,beverage is too long for this location, my main antena /umbrella/ is good for TX, but for RX I search something better What is your proposal ? 73 Teo Hello hamilton, Monday, March 21, 2005, 2:45:04 PM, you wrote: hm> Hi Teo hm> You have a vy strong signal on 137.7 qrs3 and some stns including me hve hm> been calling u on CW, but you say QRZ or QRS hm> I think u have a RX problem at ur end. hm> 73 de Mal/G3KEV Best regards, YU7AR mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: TA MAR 11/12, hamilton mal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: first TX-tests on 136kHz, Dick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: TA MAR 11/12, hamilton mal |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: TA MAR 11/12, hamilton mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |