Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | LF-Group <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Effect of LP-filter om efficiency |
| From: | Dick Rollema <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 08 Jun 2004 10:06:46 +0200 |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
To All from PA0SE The following subject may have been discussed on the reflector before but I can't remember it. Class D and E final amplifiers have high efficiency because they produce square waves. When the voltage between source and drain of the FETs is high, current is zero; when current flows voltage is almost zero. But what happens if the transmitter is followed by a low pass filter with a shunt capacitor at the input, as is often the case? Every cycle the charge in the capacitor must be reversed and with a current of finite value that takes some time. During that time current flows in the conducting transistor whilst voltage over it is not small. So one can expect dissipation in the transistor to increase and efficiency to decrease. Looking at it in the frequency domain one could say that the shunt capacitor causes the square wave to start becoming a sine wave. If the current into or out of the capacitor is so high that charge reversal takes negligible time, so the square wave is preserved, then output resistance of the transmitter is obviously so small it almost puts a short circuit over the capacitor. In that case the capacitor does nearly nothing and could just as well be deleted... The problem does not arise when the LP-filter starts with a series inductor. The sudden cut-off of current would result in a very high kick-back voltage at the drain of a single-ended amplifier, almost certain killing the transistor. But in a push pull amplifier this is prevented by the other transistor that starts to conduct at the same moment. Provided of course coupling between the two halves of the primary winding is very tight. So it seems to me that class D and E amplifiers should preferably be followed by a low pass filter with a series inductor at the transmitter side. Please correct me if my conclusion is not valid. An interesting question is whether a low pass filter is really necessary when the transmitter feeds the aerial via a series tuning coil. Harry Grimbergen, PA0LQ, has given this some thought and he says the following (my translation). Quote: Not unusual is an aerial capacitance of about 300 pF and a total loss resistance in coil, aerial and earth of some 40 ohms At 136 kHz this results in a Q of about 100 for the aerial system. At the third harmonic this produces an extra attenuation of about 280 times, or 49 dB. The third harmonic of a square wave is 9.5 dB weaker than the basic frequency. On the other hand radiation resistance increases with frequency squared; 9 dB for d3. Nevertheless harmonics will be suppressed almost 50 dB. About 16% of the power in a square wave is in the harmonics and this power is reflected back into the final amplifier. But it is not converted into heat. The DC input is decreased by this 16% as compared to the situation where the amplifier is loaded by a resistive load of 40 ohms for the above case. I have been able to show this also using simulation by MICROCAP. Unquote. A problem in The Netherlands would be that the radio inspector does not measure harmonics as field strength but as power in the output of the transmitter (or LP-filter, when present). So selectivity of the aerial system does not help. Any comments will be very welcome. 73, Dick, PA0SE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: RE: RV: From MADRID-EA4BVZ, Thomas Kölpin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: Effect of LP-filter om efficiency, Vernall |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: RV: From MADRID-EA4BVZ, James Moritz |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Effect of LP-filter om efficiency, Vernall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |