Hello Bob!
Agn tnx for try RX my signal.
This in the night I shall try DFCW120 in this time and frequency.
73! I go to sleep now.
Tuesday, April 13, 2004, 12:03:41 AM, you wrote:
V> Sam RN6BN,
V> Last night was not so productive, only a trace received in a capture at 1636
V> UTC. Nil in all other captures.
V> Commenting on QRSS vs DFCW, for beaconing the main benefit of DFCW is that
V> it has a higher "duty cycle" as it avoids the "long gaps" between characters
V> and words. Key up time does little for receiver S/N. Also the frequency
V> shift can be useful to distinguish a wanted signal from coherent QRM. For
V> DX beaconing into ZL, I suggest DFCW120. For an attempted QSO, DFCW is much
V> more productive as it makes much better use of time windows. Our next
V> booking at ZL6QH/ZM2E is 19 June, so it seems yopu have time to build a good
V> receiving antenna, hi hi.
V> For testing tonight, I suggest using DFCW120.
V> 73, Bob ZL2CA
--
Best regards,
Sam, rn6bn mailto:rn6bn@73.ru
|
