To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon |
From: | "Laurie Mayhead" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:11:27 +0100 |
References: | <001301c3833b$d8370760$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000801c3836c$85a9a4e0$a2c828c3@erica> <001e01c38371$b3408900$09dc9384@jka> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon Laurie, No offense intended, but other than the correctness of the frequency, is there anything in that shot that identifies XDW? John Andrews Hi John, I absolutely agree! but thought it worthwhile to show it, since I have not seen anything so close to that frequency before. I will continue to monitor ,and who knows. 73 all, Laurie. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re. WD2XDW Beacon, Dave Pick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon, John Andrews |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon, John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon, John Andrews |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |