Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Radials

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Radials
From: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:52:41 +0100
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
I spend time in winter on a 30' sail-boat in salt water.  Mast height about
40 ' .Lots of steel rigging and a Ally. . mast.. Can I expect miraculously
low 'ground'  resistance?. I'll just have to sail 3 miles offshore USA
unless 136 licences become more readily available. Why does 'Kite' keep
coming to mind?

Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Dennison <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: 05 August 2003 09:30
Subject: LF: Re: Radials


The site here is surrounded by cotton woods, birches and firs. This
evening
I put out  few 1/4Y radials, Yep some 550 meters in length each, but
theyve
done nothing/zilch to probably override the lossyness of this site to
local
flora and sometime fauna, but I had to try; Still 2-3 amps is 2-3 amps,
and
Im wondering how long it is before the beacon is heard somewhere.
Laurence KL1X/WD2XDW Anchorage

This test tends to confirm that what we call "earth losses" are often not
actually due to the resistance of the earth connection, but to absorption
by
vegetation, buildings and even hills. I once ran out a long radial - though
only 300m - and that did not improve my 100-ohm loss. It appears that the
site is of great importance, and there is a practical limit to the antenna
'gain' at any location. Factors such as height and ground covered by the
capacity hat are still worth improving if possible, though in many urban
areas these are limited by space and neighbours.

Mike, G3XDV
http://www.lf.thersgb.net
====================







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>