To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law |
From: | "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:28:46 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <001201c30909$57ee5a60$fe02a8c0@base> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
I believe the confusion relative to phase can be simply resolved. Adam said" I contend, as do all elementary text books regarding AC circuit analysis, that the voltage measured across a perfect resistor is perfectly "in phase" with the current flowing through that resistor. Period." You are wrong. Most interesting ... Would this mean that under certain circumstances the phase between voltage and current over/trough a resistor can be 90 degrees ? In that case the power distribution industry would be very interested as this would allow transportation of electric energy without any losses. If this is so I will inform the superconductor research group here at the university that it is about time for them to look for another research field as it is already possible to have a conductor that dissipates no power. 73, Rik ON7YD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Ohm's law revision (II), Alberto di Bene |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Amidon Cores (slightly diverging from topic), Andy talbot |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law, Alberto di Bene |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law, Claudio |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |