To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law |
From: | "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:14:18 +0200 |
References: | <001201c30909$57ee5a60$fe02a8c0@base> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 |
Ted Hart apparently wrote :> The relative phase relationship between current and voltage thru and on a resistor can be any value. > What the text books say is that a resistor does not change the phase relative to the current applied to it. > It is the duty of a capacitor and inductor to change the phase of the current thru them, > the capacitor causes the current to lead, the inductor to lag. > Let me say that again - a resistor does not change the phase of the current flowing thru it, > but it will accept any arbitray phase of the current relative to the voltage. > [...] Hmmmm, I must investigate which kind of grass does grow where that Ted Hart lives.... It could make a pleasant smoking :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Ohm's law revision (II), ipsia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Argo, Alberto di Bene |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law, ipsia |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |