| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy |
| From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:44:51 -0500 |
| References: | <[email protected]> <005e01c2d83e$bc24de60$09dc9384@jka> <005a01c2d85c$6c14f9a0$28ca28c3@erica> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Peter, The Loran line that shows at 774.03 on my screen shots is at its calculated frequency, so the other readings from those shots should be pretty exact. John Andrews |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Frequency accuracy, g3ldo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Steve Dove |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Frequency accuracy, g3ldo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Steve Dove |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |