To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy |
From: | "Steve Dove" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:48:53 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <007001c2d860$227ef1c0$09dc9384@jka> |
Organization: | d s p |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hi Peter, John's right. My display was 0.05Hz (egads!) low last night. The Loran line (top one on my display) should be sitting at '774.03. All the best, Steve 2/19/2003 4:44:51 PM, "John Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote: Peter, The Loran line that shows at 774.03 on my screen shots is at its calculated frequency, so the other readings from those shots should be pretty exact. John Andrews |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, John Andrews |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Brian Rogerson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Brian Rogerson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |