To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: HELL Tests on 137.400 kHz no success |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Fri, 15 Feb 2002 07:30:54 EST |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hello Geri, Dave, Uwe and other 'hell watchers',
I could copy Geri's hell TX here at, though much worse than visible on Uwe's screenshot. As Geri said, FeldHell is not the ultimate mode for LF, the required SNR much too high. This reminds me of the 'very narrow hell' tests initiated by Andy some time ago, and also of the very nice transmission of DF6NM's 'ultra-narrow' hell images which could be observed on a waterfall if properly adjusted. Time for a revival ? 73 Wolf DL4YHF. P.S. Dave reported a corrupt installation archive of the latest SpecLab release. I will try to send it to G3YXM, so if anyone is interested a copy may be available on Dave's site if the 1.3 MB email transfer succeeds. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: ropex, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Summer Job, Fabian Kurz |
Previous by Thread: | LF: HELL Tests on 137.400 kHz no success, 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW |
Next by Thread: | LF: SpecLab, jannsen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |