Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Band Plan

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Band Plan
From: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 01:16:36 +0100
References: <[email protected]> <001801c19822$783c1cc0$eb16073e@dave> <00f201c19890$38d6d340$d19a17d2@steve>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi-ho

I am convinced that "Gentlemen's agreement" will work much
better than a band plan (provided that all involved are gentlemen...)
New modes evolves almost every day. Let them prosper!

The 2100Hz "wide" LF band does not need a band plan carved
in stone! There is only a handful of operators on the LF band.
Compare that to the >10e6 operators that are active on HF...

Most, if not ALL, of the LF operators are connected to this mail
reflector - it should be fairly easy to coordinate things - if the need
should ever arise...

Remember that occasional interferers on the band is only a
phonecall/e-mail away and you can easily stop them when you
have a very important message to convey via LF... :-)
Interfering signals escape with the speed of light... (3e8m/s)
Why bother about a band plan when it can be solved on a
day-to-day basis?

This mail reflector, on the other hand, seems to need some kind
of a "band plan"... The S/N ratio is getting worse...

What is most fun? Exploring radio or making rules (or perhaps
throwing flames on an email reflector)?

Hihi... <g> :-) etc..

73 de Johan SM6LKM

(yes, I do love hand sent CW too)





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>