To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs |
From: | "Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:12:45 |
In-reply-to: | <3C458059.44CF7601@usa.net> |
References: | <5.1.0.14.0.20020116102434.00a7a7f8@gemini.herts.ac.uk> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | <majordom@post.thorcom.com> |
So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason. Hello Alberto, As bandwidth is important for : 1. reducing QRM to other to a minimum 2. finding a clear spot that covers the required bandwidth I would vote pro. I don't think that bandwidth indepency is of much importance, we just have to agree on what bandwith is used. Or eventually Jason could have USB/LSB switch. Thanks for the good work, Rik ON7YD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: test jason091, cesare tagliabue |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs, Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |