Hi Jim,
I too saw your signal with Jason v0.92 last night. Of course it was perfect at 
this range so there didn't seem much point in giving a report.
Like you I saw nothing of IK2DED, but that might be because I had forgotten to 
change to the Slow Option, thinking that it was kept from run to run once it 
had been set. A 233 MHz Pentium is not fast enough for the Normal (fast) option 
unfortunately.
When Johan can get round to coding the new PIC software I will have a go at 
transmitting using my G0MRF DDS, but for now am keen to listen for some remote 
stations. Looks like the frequencies are agreed, we just need some schedules 
please?
73 John, G4CNN

-----Original Message-----
From: "James Moritz"<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed Jan 23 04:45:40 PST 2002
Subject: Re: LF: Jason Tests

Dear LF Group,>

Thanks to I2PHD, DJ8WX, NL9222, G3NYK for the reports and images, and to anybody else who was watching for my Jason v0.92 test sigs. I transmitted on 137.510 from about 2030 - 2210, and on 135.910 from about 2300 - 0200.

I also looked out for IK2DED from 2000 until 2030, but saw nothing - not surprising bearing in mind the message Alberto copied! F6BWO was active around 136.922 with QRSS10. I saw an unidentified "digital" signal on about 136.8, which appeared as about 7 or 8 carriers spaced over about 100Hz - after a while, this reverted to a single carrier. Also saw another "digital" signal, presumably SXV on about 135.7 - this appeared as a large number of carriers spaced a few Hz and occupying about 100Hz bandwidth, sounding like a lot of RTTY signals having an argument.

I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz a good frequency, or is there a better one?

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

___________________________________________________