To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation |
From: | "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:44:10 +0100 |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Stewart Bryant wrote: Maybe I am missing something here, (and I am certainly not trying to detract from an excellent piece of work) but couldn't you also take the one second markers from MSF using an AM receiver, and drive your circuit with that? Related to that you might also be able to source the 1 sec pulses from a partially dissassembled MSF (or DCF77) clock. Probably the missing pulse every minute makes things more complicated... But I leave to Andy to give the correct answer. 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Stewart Bryant |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: AW: Strange signal on 135 kHz..., jannsen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Stewart Bryant |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Larry Kayser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |