LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation

from [Alberto di Bene]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation
From:	"Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:44:10 +0100
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Stewart Bryant wrote:

Maybe I am missing something here, (and I am certainly not trying
to detract from an excellent piece of work) but couldn't you also take
the one second markers from MSF using an AM receiver, and drive
your circuit with that?

Related to that you might also be able to source the 1 sec pulses
from a partially dissassembled MSF (or DCF77) clock.


Probably the missing pulse every minute makes things more complicated...
But I leave to Andy to give the correct answer.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Talbot Andrew Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Stewart Bryant LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation, Alberto di Bene <= Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Larry Kayser Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Andrew Talbot

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Stewart Bryant
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: AW: Strange signal on 135 kHz..., jannsen
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Stewart Bryant
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration, Larry Kayser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]