Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: more Wolf tests

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: more Wolf tests
From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 09:43:34 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Decidedly the spectrogram-like programs are less than ideal for
detecting the presence of a Wolf signal.
Look at this picture : http://www.qsl.net/i2phd/argo/jimwolf.html
It has been taken just a few minutes ago, receiving the test transmission
of Jim M0BMU, who at the half-hour period has sent the CW ID and
a steady carrier for a few minutes.

Yes. That is exactly why I have suggested that a WOLF transmission should have a few seconds of unmodulated carrier (or perhaps identifiably modulated - wobble) every few minutes. Also that any GUI-based WOLF front end should include a spectrogram-type window. This would allow WOLF transmissions to be seen without knowing in advance that they were there, and would also help frequency alignment. This would overcome one of the real difficulties in using the mode for random QSOs.

Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
http://www.lf.thersgb.net



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>