Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: S-meter standard

from [John Rabson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: S-meter standard
From: "John Rabson" <word.factory@zetnet.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:30:04 -0000
References: <003201c0197e$a4955e40$57d725c3@194.95.193.10.fen.baynet.de><003701c02a05$847f1d20$aa14b28f@w8k3f0> <3A774FE6.CF537646@virgin.net> <CWRyfDAP5De6Ewxn@pickmere.demon.co.uk>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: M.J.Powell <mike@pickmere.demon.co.uk>

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: LF: S-meter standard



In message <3A774FE6.CF537646@virgin.net>, Stewart Bryant
<stewart.bryant@virgin.net> writes

>    Why do the manufacturers still bother with S units. Why don't 
>    receivers just 
>    measure dBuV or dBm at the antenna? 


Because that would mean equalising the gain exactly over the whole
range. Expensive. The WJ1000 does though.


The RC411 did.

73 de
John Rabson G3PAI



















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
LF: EHT transformer cores, Claudio Girardi




Next by Date: 
Re: LF: RE: Jim's beacon, Tom Boucher




Previous by Thread: 
Re: LF: S-meter standard, Stewart Bryant




Next by Thread: 
Re: LF: S-meter standard, Stewart Bryant




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]