Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: S-meter standard |
| From: | "John Rabson" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:30:04 -0000 |
| References: | <[email protected]><003701c02a05$847f1d20$aa14b28f@w8k3f0> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: M.J.Powell <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:33 PM Subject: Re: LF: S-meter standard In message <[email protected]>, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> writes> Why do the manufacturers still bother with S units. Why don't > receivers just > measure dBuV or dBm at the antenna?Because that would mean equalising the gain exactly over the whole range. Expensive. The WJ1000 does though. The RC411 did. 73 de John Rabson G3PAI |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: EHT transformer cores, Claudio Girardi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Jim's beacon, Tom Boucher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: S-meter standard, Stewart Bryant |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: S-meter standard, Stewart Bryant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |