Mike Dennison wrote:
It has been pointed out, quite correctly, that the ARRL story about
LF operating has errors in it.
In defense of my fellow journalists, I will say that given limited
resources
What limit resources????????
it is inevitable that some errors will creep into any article.
I wrote a similar story for this week's GB2RS News Bulletin (see
http://www.rsgb.org/news from about 1600UTC Friday) and it took
me an hour to research and collate information from 20 e-mails, and
cut 1000 words of source material into 150 words aimed at the non-
LF radio amateur. Even though I know the subject well,
Not so sure, you were telling us all recently about the AR88 receivers
and
got it all wrong.
I bet there
will be some errors where I have misunderstood something (for
instance, dates are a nightmare when the dateline crosses the
transmission path).
What I have learnt from seeing some really awful amateur radio
stories in national and local newspapers is that, so long as there is
nothing damaging in the story the saying "all publicity is good
publicity" is true.
There is no excuse for getting it wrong. Research you source of
information
for the facts.
The article is certain to get several more US amateurs interested in
receiving on LF, so from our point of view it will have done its job
successfully.
Wrong information is totally misleading and confuses and cannot be
tolerated
for you to suggest otherwise is rediculous.
(professional signature line follows for a change)
Mike Dennison, G3XDV
Publications Manager
* RadCom * GB2RS News *
* RSGB Books and CDs *
* RSGB Online Web Site *
Radio Society of Great Britain
Lambda House, Cranborne Road
Potters Bar, Herts UK, EN6 3JE
Tel: +44 (0) 1707 659015; Fax: +44 (0) 1707 645105
RSGB - UK AMATEUR RADIO
| 