Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re. LF LDO>ZJ<ZZ a two way?

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re. LF LDO>ZJ<ZZ a two way?
From: "Petr Maly" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:54:02 +0100
References: <000101c09751$4b554b00$f0b6883e@lvm>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
I always belived that 2-way QSO means contact between 2 stations, not 3 of
them.
Isn't this 3-way QSO ? (hi...).

73 Petr OK1FIG


----- Original Message -----
From: LAWRENCE MAYHEAD <[email protected]>
To: rsgb lf group <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: LF: Re. LF LDO>ZJ<ZZ a two way?


I personally dont think that there can be much doubt that this was a
QSO,between LDO and ZJ, with ZJ having a remote Tx at ZZs location. If
there
had been a 250 mile(dist. ZZ to ZJ I belive) switch line between them,
when
John identified Peters message he would  have pushed the transmit
button! to
reply. Since he did not have this land line he simply asked ZZ to push
the
button via an 80 m link,a pretty fine distinction in my opinion.What do
you
think ?  73s Laurie.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>