Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re. QRSS Proceedure |
| From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:54:20 -0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <001a01c07a49$2b7eb7a0$99ba883e@lvm> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the Qrss explanation,but why repeat T M or O ? Is this just to ensure that it gets through or is O O O more readable than O ? 73s Laurie. Well, normally the T, M or O is sent three times just to make sure it gets through. I had suggested that we could get away with sending it just twice for the transatlantic tests. Of course, if someone sends an O to you first, it should not be necessary to repeat, but the level of QSB may make repeats essential. In any case I am not trying to dictate, just to suggest an efficient approach. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Loading coil Q, Steve Rawlings |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: ARGO Build 113., Mike Dennison |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re. QRSS Proceedure, Rik Strobbe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Loading coil Q, Steve Rawlings |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |