| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: SV: Re: Puckeridge test |
| From: | "C Andersson" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 May 2000 14:59:27 +0200 |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
I worked Jim straight after you and found exactly the opposite..... 4dB better on the "small" antenna. Same thing here. Small antenna 3 dB better. /Christer sm6pxj |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: QRV on 136 and Puckeridge tests, john sexton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Puckeridge test 2, Dick Rollema |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: QRV on 136 and Puckeridge tests, john sexton |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Puckeridge test 2, Dick Rollema |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |