To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: beacon power control (was Re: LF: IK1ODO beacon signal) |
From: | "Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be> |
Date: | Wed, 03 May 2000 13:28:34 |
In-reply-to: | <E12mvIH-00065B-00@post.thorcom.com> |
References: | <3.0.1.16.20000503100301.2e77a8b0@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> <4.1.20000502224757.020c4040@mailer.inrete.it> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | <majordom@post.thorcom.com> |
At 11:17 3/05/00 +1, IZ1ANT wrote: On the contrary a very accurate PA proctection would be required if a POSITIVE feedback to the antenna current meter has to be connected to an unattended TX. The feedback from the amp-meter to the TX is NEGATIVE (if the antennacurrent increases the TX output power is forced to decrease). In combination with a reflected power protection (as used by G3YXM in this TX design) the TX will withstand any mistreatement including short- and open-circuit. As the beacon is meant to be low-power (10mW and less) a relative small TX power can be used (50 Watts and less), so it can easily be overdimensioned to provide extra safety. 73, Rik ON7YD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: PKZIP, Andre' Kesteloot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: beacon power control, Andre' Kesteloot |
Previous by Thread: | LF: beacon power control (was Re: LF: IK1ODO beacon signal), Aldo Marchetto |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: beacon power control, Andre' Kesteloot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |