To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: AMRAD Antenna ? |
From: | "Dave" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jan 2000 20:11:53 -0000 |
References: | <29188.200001071140@gemini> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
That Amrad antenna... Both ends grounded means that there is no huge voltage gradient on the line, something to watch for as we have hung the line from one tree to another, through a forest. Surely the Voltage gradient is just the same but the other way round? High current point at the earthed end and high Voltage point at the TX site as it is about a quarter wave.... The "earthed at the far end" idea has been used with topband antennas for years in order to get the current into the vertical drop. 73 Dave G3YXM. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: CFH ......more from Jon, Alan Melia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: AMRAD Antenna ?, Andre' Kesteloot |
Previous by Thread: | LF: AMRAD Antenna ?, Andre' Kesteloot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: AMRAD Antenna ?, Andre' Kesteloot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |